目前正值2022年考研備考的最后階段，相信大家都在緊張地復(fù)習(xí)當(dāng)中。在最后階段，適當(dāng)?shù)恼骖}練習(xí)也是非常重要的。下面，幫考網(wǎng)為大家?guī)?lái)考研初試英語(yǔ)分析題的部分歷年真題，一起來(lái)看看。

Directions:

Thefollowing paragraphs are given in a wrong order. FｏｒQuestions 41-45, you arerequired to reorganize these paragraphs into a coherent article by choosingfrom the list A-G ａｎｄ filling them into the numbered boxes. Paragraph C ａｎｄ Fhave been correctly placed. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)

A. Thesetools can help you win every argument-not in the unhelpful sense of beatingyour opponents but in the better sense of learning about the issues that dividepeople. Learning why they disagree with us ａｎｄ learning to talk ａｎｄ worktogether with them. If we readjust our view of arguments—from a verbal fight ｏｒtennis game to areasoned exchange through which we all gain mutual respect, ａｎｄ understanding—then we change the very nature of what itmeans to “win” an argument.

B. Ofcourse, many discussions are not so successful. Still, we need to be carefulnot to accuse opponents of bad arguments too quickly. We need to learn how toevaluate them properly. A large part of evaluation is calling out badarguments, but we also need to admit good arguments by opponents ａｎｄ to applythe same critical standards to ourselves. Humility requires you to recognizeweakness in your own arguments ａｎｄ sometimes also to accept reasons on theopposite side.

C. Noneof these will be easy but you can start even if others refuse to. Next time youstate your position, formulate an argument fｏｒwhat you claim ａｎｄ honestly askyourself whether your argument is any good. Next time you talk with someone whotakes a stand, ask them to give you a reason fｏｒtheir view. Spell out theirargument fully ａｎｄ charitably. Assess its strength impartially. Raiseobjections ａｎｄ listen carefully to their replies.

D.Carnegie would be right if arguments were fights, which is how we often thinkof them. Like physical fights, verbal fights can leave both sides bloodied.Even when you win, you end up no better off. Your prospects would be almost asdismal if arguments were even just competitions-like, say, tennis games. Parisof opponents hit the ball back ａｎｄ forth until one winner emerges from all whoentered. Everybody else loses. This kind of thinking is why so many people tryto avoid arguments, especially about politics ａｎｄ religion.

E. In his1936 work How to Win Friends ａｎｄ Influence People , Dale Carnegie wrote: “there is only one way…to get the

best ofan argument-ａｎｄ that is to avoid it. “This aversionto arguments is common, but it depends on a mistaken view of arguments thatcauses profound problems fｏｒour personal ａｎｄ social lives- ａｎｄ in many waysmisses the point of arguing in the first place.

F. Theseviews of arguments also undermine reason. If you see a conversation as a fightｏｒcompetition, you can win by cheating as long as you don’t get caught. You will be happy to convincepeople with bad arguments. You can call their views stupid, ｏｒjoke about howignorant they are. None of these tricks will help you understａｎｄ them, theirpositions ｏｒthe issues that divide you, but they can help you win-in one way.

G. Thereis a better way to win arguments. Imagine that you favｏｒincreasing the minimumwage in our state, ａｎｄ I do not. If you yell, “yes,” ａｎｄ I yell. “No,” neither of uslearns anything. We neither understａｎｄ nｏｒrespect each other, ａｎｄ we have nobasis fｏｒcompromise ｏｒcooperation. In contrast, suppose you give a reasonableargument: that full-time workers should not have to live in poverty. Then Icounter with another reasonable argument: that a higher minimum wage will forcebusinesses to employ fewer people fｏｒless time. Now we can understａｎｄ eachother’s positions ａｎｄ recognize ourshared values, since we both care about needy workers.

以上就是幫考網(wǎng)為大家?guī)?lái)的全部信息，希望能給大家一些幫助。另外，小伙伴們?nèi)绻€有其他關(guān)于考研信息的疑問(wèn)，也可以留言咨詢。